Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Nuclear Powered Mars Vessels!


Worst Poster of Always

Status: Offline
Posts: 1640
Date:
Nuclear Powered Mars Vessels!


I want to go on one! Especially a Russian one. I just picture them all saying Vessels like that Russian guy on old Star Trek.

Vessel vessel vessel!

Sorry about that. I was chatting with old people from the BRMB and linking them to this and the other MB to try n' get more posters.

SORRY FOR TRYING SO HARD AND CARING TOO MUCH!

-- Edited by Dexter on Friday 30th of October 2009 03:59:56 AM

__________________

When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. - Mae West





Sheriff of Paddy's

Status: Offline
Posts: 10225
Date:

Way to know how to link to something Dexter.

__________________
"Not only is pizza attractive and charming, he also has a huge penis." - Awkward Smile


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

These nuclear space vessels, if they exist (you fail at linking), are the way to go in terms of long-distance rocket travel. The weight and expense of liquid rocket fuel is absurd.


Since we're on the topic, I think the first travelers to Mars should have a one-way ticket. It's just too costly to send people both ways at this point.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Good luck finding volunteers for a one-way trip to Mars.

__________________


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

I have absolutely no doubt that people would line up for that assignment.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Also, with water being relatively abundant on Mars, it's not much of a stretch to think that fuel for the return trip could be manufactured on the planet.

__________________


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

GOOD NEWS EVERYBODY.

__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Worst Poster of Always

Status: Offline
Posts: 1640
Date:

I'd so go to mars on a ship filled with Russians saying vessel.

__________________

When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. - Mae West





Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

john31584 wrote:

Also, with water being relatively abundant on Mars, it's not much of a stretch to think that fuel for the return trip could be manufactured on the planet.




Eventually?  Sure.

By 2020, when NASA is supposedly going to do this?  I wouldn't count on it.



__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

2020 is the goal for a return to the moon.

A manned trip to Mars is set for 2030, at the very earliest.

-- Edited by john31584 on Monday 2nd of November 2009 07:46:35 PM

__________________


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

But yes, given the current state of NASA, I wouldn't trust them with much more than a potato gun at this point.

__________________


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

NASA: "Derrrrr whoops! I guess we just wasted $200 million because we can't tell the difference between metric and English measurement! Durpty blurpty bloo"

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

We should give them some bottle rockets to play with, and if nobody loses an eye, we'll talk.

I can see the headlines now: "Preliminary tests of the bottle rocket ignition system (a $1.00 lighter) are scheduled to begin in 2013, and cost $30 million"

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard