MorisUkunRasik wrote:so you're currently not gay. but that would imply that you could have been previously.
so you're currently not gay. but that would imply that you could have been previously.
Logically, it wouldn't.
MorisUkunRasik wrote:right now he's not gay, but he didn't clarify if he ever was.
right now he's not gay, but he didn't clarify if he ever was.
Right, but that does not imply that he in fact was.
john31584 wrote:No. I've never been gay.I'm pretty sure that if I was, I'd know by now.
No. I've never been gay.I'm pretty sure that if I was, I'd know by now.
last I heard you still had a semester left, plenty of time to experiment
Jason wrote: MorisUkunRasik wrote:right now he's not gay, but he didn't clarify if he ever was.Right, but that does not imply that he in fact was.
but its possible that he was, is what I'm sayin dawg.
MorisUkunRasik wrote: john31584 wrote:No. I've never been gay.I'm pretty sure that if I was, I'd know by now. last I heard you still had a semester left, plenty of time to experiment
I've been to gay bars before.
That lifestyle does not appeal to me at all.
I'm not nearly fabulous enough. :(
Jason wrote:It's possible that John is an earthworm who learned to type. That does not imply that he is an earthworm who learned to type.
It's possible that John is an earthworm who learned to type. That does not imply that he is an earthworm who learned to type.
I think one of our ideas is a lot closer to probability than the other.
Jason wrote:Possibility implies nothing, is all I'm sayin dawg.
Possibility implies nothing, is all I'm sayin dawg.
john31584 wrote:Right now, neither of them is true!-- Edited byMATHSEX
Right now, neither of them is true!-- Edited byMATHSEX