MorisUkunRasik wrote: John, you might want to hold off on buying that ring for your sweety.
John, you might want to hold off on buying that ring for your sweety.
**** that. the state doesn't validate your relationship. I do think it's horrible that human rights issues are even put to a vote, let alone that so many people are actually voting against them.
cheeselover wrote: MorisUkunRasik wrote: John, you might want to hold off on buying that ring for your sweety.**** that. the state doesn't validate your relationship. I do think it's horrible that human rights issues are even put to a vote, let alone that so many people are actually voting against them.
1. I'm not actually gay, but I stopped objecting to the "John's gay" jokes quite a while ago.
2. This is horrible. It looks increasingly likely to pass, but there's still a real chance that it won't. I really hope it doesn't.
Jason wrote:Even if it doesn't pass in CA, similar and equally heinous ballot initiatives are passing in other states.When will people make a stand on this human rights issue? When we the good people of this country refuse to allow the law to side with the bigot?
Even if it doesn't pass in CA, similar and equally heinous ballot initiatives are passing in other states.When will people make a stand on this human rights issue? When we the good people of this country refuse to allow the law to side with the bigot?
MATHSEX wrote: Jason wrote:Even if it doesn't pass in CA, similar and equally heinous ballot initiatives are passing in other states.When will people make a stand on this human rights issue? When we the good people of this country refuse to allow the law to side with the bigot?when the christian cocksuckers get voted out of power when the populace finally gets its heads out of its collective ass