Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: So stupid old conserv. republican at work


Worst Poster of Always

Status: Offline
Posts: 1640
Date:
RE: So stupid old conserv. republican at work


SlashXLA wrote:

 

Dexter wrote:
 I'm sorry, are we looking at the same administration?

 



No, you aren't.  Piggie is talking about Clinton administration era policies that led to a housing bubble.  You are talking about what Bush tried to do to stop the crash.

 




 I'm not going to blame the administration we had a surplus under for the administration we have the hugest deficite in history under for mismanagement of economic policy.



__________________

When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. - Mae West





Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 314
Date:

It takes a while for a bubble to grow before it bursts.

__________________


Spaghetti

Status: Offline
Posts: 1555
Date:

You know what Dexter? You're aaaalright.

__________________

"grooved stick and handle, for easy riding"



Spaghetti

Status: Offline
Posts: 1555
Date:

MorisUkunRasik wrote: A truly free market can and will fix itself, even if that means people will lose their jobs or businesses.
Priceless.



__________________

"grooved stick and handle, for easy riding"



Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

People will lose their jobs/businesses temporarily as the market redesigns itself to be better than it was before.

Also, the Bush administration's economic policy, if it has one, is an abysmal failure even if this crisis has its roots in Clinton-era politics (which in no way suggests Bill Clinton's politics are primarily responsible for the present situation).

Slash, are you seriously saying that two recessions under the same president is entirely the responsibility of the previous president?

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Spaghetti

Status: Offline
Posts: 1555
Date:

How do you 'temporarily' lose your business?

__________________

"grooved stick and handle, for easy riding"



Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

You a) make another one or b) find another occupation.

Don't get me wrong -- recovery after an economic catastrophe of this scale will be painful for a lot of people who weren't even responsible for the catastrophe. However, the mismanagement that caused this crisis, from what I understand of it, is a product of distorted incentives put in place by state intervention. The fact that these interventions coincided with deregulation in other fields could be just that -- a coincidence.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Spaghetti

Status: Offline
Posts: 1555
Date:

Or it could not be.

__________________

"grooved stick and handle, for easy riding"



Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Or this mess could have been caused by leprechauns conspiring with unicorns.

__________________


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

Let's postpone any broad-based conclusions about the entire idea of a free market before we decide what the actual cause was, shall we?

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

We all know America is a laissez-faire society, and George Bush regularly considers the writings of Ludwig Von Mises

__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

When politicians constantly remark on how they're in favor of free markets, how they want markets to be free, how, after you've given them your voice and they've assumed ultimate power over your life, they'll make the markets free.... it makes it very difficult to tell people free markets work. Whatever the politicians are doing, it isn't working.

However, it becomes difficult to convince people that the markets aren't free. It draws forth analogies between laissez-faire and communism, that is "sounds good in theory" and that its proponents always suggest that "Sure, this doesn't work, but it's not REALLY communism/laissez-faire... When we really get to communism/laissez-faire, society will work and everything will be okay."

Sure, these aren't good arguments, but that doesn't matter for most people. I almost feel like we need another word to use in favor of our theory, one that bureaucrats and plutocrats haven't stolen and abused for their own purposes.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

A society free of coercion, where the government remains constrained to it's job of retaliating against the initiation of force is a society I don't believe can fail. I don't gage the success of a society by how many people are employed.

__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

I agree. The idea of capitalism has been so twisted in modern discourse, that most people don't know what it actually means. Of course, it still has a real meaning, notwithstanding the pretend version of capitalism that politicians espouse.

I think it's important to educate people about what capitalism actually is (and, maybe more importantly, what it is not), and remind them of the fact that, unlike communism, the merits of capitalism are actually borne out by reality: the closer any society has come to true capitalism, the better off it's been.

__________________


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

The misrepresentation of capitalism is precisely why voting for Republicans is probably just as damaging as voting Democrat, if not more. At least a Democrat is a bit more up front of their hatred of free markets.

__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

The way I see it, you're going to lose economic freedom either way. The question, then, is whether you wan to give up more social and personal freedom, in addition to that (free speech, abortion rights, religious freedom, etc.).

As an Objectivist, I think that voting for either political party is largely futile, but it seems that the net loss of freedom is slightly smaller when voting for Democrats. I'm probably not going to bother voting for president, though. I'm just going to vote on ballot initiatives, where my vote might actually matter a little.

__________________


Worst Poster of Always

Status: Offline
Posts: 1640
Date:

Andy001 wrote:

You know what Dexter? You're aaaalright.




I just might send you cookies now.



__________________

When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. - Mae West





Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 614
Date:

MorisUkunRasik wrote:

was blaming democrats for the bail out not going through. Her reasoning?

"40 Percent of democrats voted against it!"

That statement alone is enough to get slapped for. Without including the fact that 67 percent of Republicans voted against the bail out.



I had a stupid liberal democrat tell me the same thing at work today.  What an idiot!



__________________



I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

john31584 wrote:

The way I see it, you're going to lose economic freedom either way. The question, then, is whether you wan to give up more social and personal freedom, in addition to that (free speech, abortion rights, religious freedom, etc.).

As an Objectivist, I think that voting for either political party is largely futile, but it seems that the net loss of freedom is slightly smaller when voting for Democrats. I'm probably not going to bother voting for president, though. I'm just going to vote on ballot initiatives, where my vote might actually matter a little.




 I argue with so many Objectivists and libertarians who may fall on the pro-war side of foreign policy, and they always seem to come up with a rationalization for voting Republican.  More and more over the past year, I really don't see what any political libertarian can see in the Republican party at all.



__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

Is PIGGIE voting Democrat?

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard