Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Go Google Go


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:
Go Google Go


Google officially came out against Proposition 8 in California, which would restrict gay marriage in the state.

Other companies that have come out against the measure include Levi Strauss and PG&E.

I don't remember a time when companies would publicly oppose and even provide funds for a social cause. Even if I'm wrong and that happens all the time, that shouldn't take away from the goodness of this cause.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 314
Date:

A company owned by a single person should be able to do this, but a publicly owned and traded company is doing a disservice to its owners by making political statements on their behalf, and steal from the stockholders by providing funds to a cause.

__________________


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

Who gives a **** about such a stupid issue? I mean, of all the things to publicly support.

__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 314
Date:

The U.S. should just get rid of legal marriage altogether. If people want to be married, let a willing church do it and let the state have nothing to do with it.

__________________


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

DEATHPIGGIE wrote:

Who gives a **** about such a stupid issue? I mean, of all the things to publicly support.





I think it's fairly important, as a matter of principle.

__________________


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

SlashXLA wrote:

The U.S. should just get rid of legal marriage altogether. If people want to be married, let a willing church do it and let the state have nothing to do with it.



Slash has got the Libertarian talking points down, dawg.

 



__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

john31584 wrote:

 

DEATHPIGGIE wrote:

Who gives a **** about such a stupid issue? I mean, of all the things to publicly support.




 


I think it's fairly important, as a matter of principle.

 




 In the order of social issues, I really don't care much.  I agree with Slash, so supporting gay marriage is pretty minor.



__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 314
Date:

DEATHPIGGIE wrote:

 

Slash has got the Libertarian talking points down, dawg.

 



 It's weird.   For the first time, I feel like I have a coherent and sensible world view across the board, and yet I find myself truly lost.



__________________


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

I agree that marriage should basically be treated like any other contract, and freedom to contract is essential in any free society.

__________________


I'm fat and nobody likes me

Status: Offline
Posts: 8440
Date:

SlashXLA wrote:

 

DEATHPIGGIE wrote:

 

Slash has got the Libertarian talking points down, dawg.

 



It's weird. For the first time, I feel like I have a coherent and sensible world view across the board, and yet I find myself truly lost.

 




 Lost in what sense?



__________________
4176_72679264115_502169115_1632781_7399058_n.jpg


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 314
Date:

The loss of ideological fervor has led me to lose purpose.

__________________


I NEED BABIES!!!

Status: Offline
Posts: 999
Date:

I'm liking you more and more, Slash.

__________________


MASTER BATOR

Status: Offline
Posts: 1164
Date:

SlashXLA wrote:

A company owned by a single person should be able to do this, but a publicly owned and traded company is doing a disservice to its owners by making political statements on their behalf, and steal from the stockholders by providing funds to a cause.




 the beauty of a publicly owned company is that any investor can sell his/her stock if s/he doesn't like the way the company is run

props to google



__________________


Only in cartoons

Status: Offline
Posts: 4655
Date:

Google made this decision publicly because many of their employees would be effected negatively by Proposition 8. The welfare of their employees is linked to the welfare of the company as a whole. Google has not given any money to the cause; they've just made their opinion known.

If some homophobe stockholder has a problem with it, they can sell their shares. With Google specifically, though, many of the shares are owned by employees.

Of course I would like marriage to be treated like any other contract, and not legally defined in any special way by the state. However, as long as it IS defined and enforced by the state, it should apply equally to all men and women irrespective of whom they choose as their partner in life.

__________________
Jason: a demanding lover
Jasno: a lover in demand


Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

I don't expect Prop 8 to pass. Every poll shows it trailing significantly, which is interesting, since right after the Supreme Court made its decision, polls showed support for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and it had no trouble getting the signatures needed to get on the ballot.

Since same-sex couples have been getting married for a few months now, and society hasn't been brought to its knees, people are realizing that it's not a big deal, and maybe even that it's none of their business.

The same thing happened when the Massachusetts Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 614
Date:

I have no problem with gay people getting married, but at the same time I think we should have equal rights for people who want to marry animals.

__________________



Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

An animal can't enter a contract. Therefore, it's impossible to marry an animal.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 614
Date:

Discrimination!!!

__________________



Zinc Saucier

Status: Offline
Posts: 5420
Date:

Actually, no.

Animals lack the mental capacity to understand a contract, so it's impossible for them to consent to one. A contract requires the consent of both parties. Since animals can't really consent to anything, they can't enter contracts.

For the same reasons, children and insane people can't form valid contracts.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 614
Date:



__________________

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard