There are quite a few things I'd like to cover, and I'd like for other people to share their questions, but I'll start with this: What exactly are Mortage-Backed Securities, and why did investors ever think it was a good idea to purchase them?
Shockingly enough, I've been spending a good part of the evening reading that and similar pages. I was hoping we could discuss it in more informal terms, but never mind.
I suppose what I'm trying to understand is: what is the financial benefit to buying up a big package of someone else's debt? How does that turn around into a profit for someone? (Or alternatively, am I mistaken for thinking that's how it works?)
I learned about mortgage backed securities and stuff in Land Valuation.... but my final exam for that was yesterday so I don't care anymore... My math exam is on Thursday so I do still care about derivatives however.
I suppose what I'm trying to understand is: what is the financial benefit to buying up a big package of someone else's debt? How does that turn around into a profit for someone? (Or alternatively, am I mistaken for thinking that's how it works?)
I keep getting notices that my student loans might be sold to third parties. Basically, when you buy debt, you're buying somebody's obligation to pay you.
Suppose I owe you $100,000, with interest. I've paid off about $50,000 of the principal, so I've still got well over $50,000 to pay you. To make it simple, let's say I still owe you $60,000.
Somebody might come in and offer to buy my $60,000 in debt for $55,000. That's less than you expected to get originally, but it's still a profit, since you're getting back more than you loaned me. If you're less than confident about my ability to pay you back, you might be happy to sell my debt at this price. Of course, the buyer is betting that I'll be able to pay it back in full.
If you sell the debt, my obligation is now to pay the full $60,000 and any subsequent interest to the buyer. I see absolutely no change on my end, but you're up $5,000, and don't have to worry about trying to collect from me anymore. If all goes according to plan, the buyer will also end up at least $5,000 ahead.
My understanding is that a huge number of these transactions took place during the housing bubble; people were buying huge packages of mortgage debt. They figured that housing prices would keep going up, and even if they had to foreclose, they'd turn a profit when they sold the house. Prices plummeted, debtors defaulted, and people realized that they were just pouring money into a hole.
Thank you John, that is immensely helpful. Would you agree with me, though, that when carried out on a large scale, that is a very risky way to go about business, especially when many of the mortages purchased came from subprime lending, which is by definition a risk? As you said yourself, lenders have the most incentive to sell on the debt when they suspect that they may not be repaid, and given that it seems to be a truism of finance that house prices can never go on rising indefinately, I just feel that people should have learned to stop much sooner than they did.
That's really the extent of my understanding of the matter.
I would guess, however, that a combination of factors led to investors acting in economically irrational ways. Part of it is that the system was so complicated that they didn't really know what they were getting into when they bought up a lot of this debt. Another part of it was probably government policies creating warped incentives.