I'm all for anyone being held prisoner by the U.S to have a fair and objective trial not overseen behind closed doors, with vindictive military members, but should we be releasing people we know are up to no good into the U.S just because they never actually killed an American, but did just about everything besides?
The problem is that they were determined to be eligible for release quite some time ago, but the only countries that will take them are places where they're likely to be tortured and/or executed. Sending people to such countries violates U.S. law.
A large number of prisoners at Guantanamo are in that exact same situation. So, do we hold people who are legally eligible for release forever, do we send them to a place where they're going to be tortured, or do we release them into the U.S.?
It's not an easy question, and I'm not sure I know the right answer.
See, since you're an American citizen, you'll probably be tried in a civilian court and sentenced to death or a very long time in a boring old federal prison.